Transparent Review Policy
The journal follows triple blind peer review policy. Manuscript is sent to three reviewers (the experts in respective field) to review a manuscript/paper as one of the fundamental journal’s guidelines and to maintain independent review and quality in publishing research paper. Two reviewers are defined by the Journal management and editorial Board respectively, while the third reviewer is always suggested by the Authors’ team while submitting their research manuscript. For papers that need revisions, the same reviewers will be used to ensure that the quality of the revised paper is acceptable.
Copyrights for articles published in the journal are retained by the authors but on publishing ‘publication rights’ are granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author’s responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Editorial board is very strict regarding plagiarism. EEHC Journal believes that taking the ideas and work of others without giving them credit is completely unfair and dishonest. Copying even one sentence from someone else’s manuscript, or even one of your own that has previously been published, without proper citation is considered plagiarism-use your own words instead. Editorial board retains the absolute authority to reject the review process of a submitted manuscript if it subject to minor or major plagiarism and even may cancel the publication upon complaint of victim(s) of plagiarism.